Setting:
The malaria-endemic country of Liberia, before, during and after the 2014 Ebola outbreak.
Objective:
To describe the consequences of the Ebola outbreak on Liberia's National Malaria Programme and its post-Ebola recovery.
Design:
A retrospective cross-sectional study using routine countrywide programme data.
Results:
Malaria caseloads decreased by 47% during the Ebola outbreak and by 11% after, compared to the pre-Ebola period. In those counties most affected by Ebola, a caseload reduction of >20% was sustained for 12 consecutive months, while this lasted for only 4 consecutive months in the counties least affected by Ebola. Linear regression of monthly proportions of confirmed malaria cases—as a proxy indicator of programme performance—over the pre- and post-Ebola periods indicated that the malaria programme could require 26 months after the end of the acute phase of the Ebola outbreak to recover to pre-Ebola levels.
Conclusions:
The differential persistence of reduced caseloads in the least- and most-affected counties, all of which experienced similar emergency measures, suggest that factors other than Ebola-related security measures played a key role in the programme's reduced performance. Clear guidance on when to abandon the emergency measures after an outbreak may be needed to ensure faster recovery of malaria programme performance.