The focus of this paper was the effect of external debt burden on the capacity to meet Sustainable
Development Goal (SDG) of quality education in 2030 with external debt servicing and
government annual budgetary allocation to education as proxies for debt burden and quality
education respectively. The author captured the following data for the study: annual budgetary
allocation to education, external debt stock, external debt service and interest payment on debt
from 1970 to 2025, sourced from World Bank data, Federal Office of Statistics (FOS), National
Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Annual Reports and Accounts, and
various other sources. These time series data were subjected to unit root test and found
appropriate for OLS analysis. To estimate the model for inference, Autoregressive Distributed
Lag (ARDL) technique was employed by the author. The results of the analysis indicated that in
the short run, only external debt service payment had significant negative effect on education in
Nigeria; while the rest of the variables were not significant at 5% level of significance. Over the
long run only external debt stock had significant negative effect on education; while the rest of
the variables were not significant at 5% level of significance. Based on the short run results, it
was concluded that external debt burden had significant negative effect on education in the
period 1970-2025 in Nigeria. Implications of the findings: external debt burden depressed
education in Nigeria especially in the reviewed period. ii. This would impact negatively on the
quality of education both in the short run and over the long run in Nigeria. iii. If this situation
was not reversed, meeting Sustainable Development Goal of quality education in 2030 by
Nigeria would be frustrated. Recommendations: Government should place more priority on
funding of education by freeing resources from unproductive areas to the education sector. ii.
Government should adopt public-private sectors partnership by collaborating with the private
sector for reforms.iii. Government should focus more on vocational training by equipping
students with practical skills. Government should prioritize educational spending by allocating
more budgets to education. Debt restructuring should be adopted by exploring more options to
manage debt burden among other recommendations.