Abstract
The paper examines contact-induced morphosyntactic change in Swahili, where material which had
historically been lost is ‘reintroduced’ through contact with closely related languages which have retained the original
feature. The paper discusses three examples of these morphosyntactic ‘false cognates’: diminutive marking, habitual marking
and demonstrative forms, and shows that if it were not from the evidence from different diachronic stages and varieties of
Swahili, these forms could well be analysed as inherited from Proto-Bantu. The paper contributes to our understanding of the
historical development of Swahili, patterns of variation found in Swahili and Bantu languages more widely, as well as the
importance of comparative evidence for the unravelling of historical and contemporary relations between closely related
linguistic varieties.