Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

OER in and as MOOCs (Advance online publication)

Domaine:

education
Créateur:
Czerniewicz, LauraDeacon, AndrewWalji, SukainaGlover, Michael
Éditeur:
African Minds, International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development
Hôte:avatar

This chapter reports on the investigation into the production and rollout of four Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) at the University of Cape Town (UCT) in South Africa, and on the experiences of the educators involved in their production. The overarching aim of this study is to address the question: How does MOOC-making with Open Educational Resources (OER) influence educators’ Open Educational Practices (OEP)? The authors were interested to know why UCT educators wanted to make MOOCs, whether they adopted OER, whether their practices become more open after making a MOOC, and in which ways.

Drawing on Beetham et al. (2012) and Hodgkinson-Williams (2014), an analytic framework of OEP was developed comprising three dimensions: legal, pedagogical and financial. The research methodology is qualitative, using semi-structured interviews and data from MOOC discussion forums. Six MOOC lead educators were interviewed at three intervals: before their MOOCs ran, immediately after their MOOC’s first run, and six to 10 months later. Transcripts were coded using OEP concepts.

The findings offer insights into the relationships between educators’ motivations for making MOOCs, their MOOC design tools, the OEP that can be identified and the contradictions they experienced in making MOOCs. Despite the challenges that educators faced, they largely achieved their purposes of making MOOCs and manifested legal, pedagogical and financial dimensions of OEP. The impact on educators’ open practices was observed in several subsequent projects after the MOOCs were first run. Tensions involved in making MOOCs, adopting OER and enacting OEP point to how educators could be better supported to become more open in their educational practices.

No negative experiences were attributed to the creation of OER and, indeed, MOOC-making with OER appeared to be conducive to OER adoption in general. However, more time would be needed to conclude whether these educators could become OER advocates or could function autonomously in creating and sharing OER.

Citation: Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Walji, S. & Glover, M. (2017). OER in and as MOOCs. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South. Chapter 10 advance publication. Retrieved from dx.doi.org Corresponding author:

Visit

doi.org

Tags

Global Southlearner-centredMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)MOOCOEPOEROER EducationOpen Educational PracticesOpen Educational Resourcesopen practices+4

Licenses

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similaires

OER in and as MOOCsTeacher educators and OER in East Africa: Interrogating pedagogic change (Advance online publication)OER use in the Global South: A baseline survey of higher education instructors (Advance online publication)

OER in and as MOOCs

This chapter reports on the investigation into the production and rollout of four Massive O

Teacher educators and OER in East Africa: Interrogating pedagogic change (Advance online publication)

This study examines the use of Open Educational Resources (OER) in six teacher education in

OER use in the Global South: A baseline survey of higher education instructors (Advance online publication)

The research presented here provides baseline data regarding the use of Open Educational Re