Livestock diseases such as Rift Valley Fever (RVF) present systemic threats to animal health, rural livelihoods, and national economies in endemic regions. However, conventional impact assessments often fail to capture the nonlinear feedbacks, time lags, and cross-sectoral interactions involved. This study develops a dynamic, multi-component system dynamics (SD) model to simulate the Epidemiological and Economic impacts of RVF outbreaks in Ijara County, Kenya, under alternative vaccination strategies. The model integrates biologically detailed Susceptible Exposed Infectious (SEI) dynamics for Aedes and Culex mosquito vectors, Susceptible Exposed Infectious Recovered (SEIR) livestock infection dynamics, herd demography, and end-market processes, incorporating demand-side shocks and behavioral feedback. Using a 10-year simulation with a daily time-step, parameterized with primary and secondary data, including El Niño associated rainfall patterns and producer survey results, the model reproduces key outbreak features consistent with historical RVF events and enables ex-ante comparison of policy responses. Findings indicate that the business-as-usual (BAU) strategy, involving delayed reactionary vaccination, yields only marginal improvements in herd recovery and producer income relative to no intervention. In contrast, annual preventive vaccination with sufficient coverage of susceptible animals prevents simulated outbreaks within the model horizon, while biannual and triennial strategies reduce outbreak severity but do not fully eliminate risk. Shortening the delay between outbreak onset and vaccination initiation substantially reduces livestock losses and improves income recovery trajectories. These results highlight the value of system dynamics modeling for evaluating intervention strategies under uncertainty. The model offers a decision-support tool for livestock health policy, demonstrating that proactive vaccination and rapid response outperform delayed, reactive approaches in both disease control and economic resilience in RVF-prone pastoral systems.