This study followed an interdisciplinary mixed approach that consisted
of social research methods and geospatial technology to investigate the
livestock mobility of four pastoralists groups from Sudan and two
Ethiopian pastoralist groups who fled to Sudan due to the conflict in
the Tigray region. The study area is a shared borderland located between
the two countries and is part of Gadarif State in Sudan and the Tigray
and Amhara regions in Ethiopia. The findings of the study showed that
there are diverse types of pastoral mobility, ranging from short and
circular movement to wide and directional type of mobility in response
to seasonal climatic factors, the spread of mechanized farming and the
eruption of insecurity events. Despite facing numerous challenges
including the governments' opposition to cross border movement and the
prevalence of looting and rustling, trans-boundary mobility is practiced
by most pastoralist groups in the borderland. The current ongoing
conflict in the Tigary region forced many Ethiopian pastoralists to flee
to Sudan with their animals, and they have had to cope with this
situation by reducing the number of heads they own and limit their
mobility to a more confined area. Despite competing claims by both
governments, there is a pressing need for a cooperative land management
policy that applies soft border arrangements that incorporate customary
land use rights for pastoralists from both sides, instead of the
hardline border policies currently in place.