This dataset supports an investigation into the variation of vegetative
and reproductive traits of six plant species characteristic of
Mediterranean temporary ponds, Baldellia ranunculoides, Damasonium
bourgaei, Damasonium polyspermum, Elatine brochonii, and Isoetes velata,
across a 750-km north-south latitudinal (climate) gradient (31°-35° N) in
Morocco (mean annual precipitation range 264 to 856 mm). Selected
vegetative (height, number of leaves, leaf area) and reproductive (number
of fruits, number of seeds/spores per fruit, number of seeds/spores per
plant, seed/spore size and seed mass) traits of these six species were
assessed on both field-collected specimens and on plants grown from
seeds/spores in mesocosms under uniform experimental conditions. We
hypothesized that the observed differences in functional traits
(vegetative and reproductive) among populations mainly reflect phenotypic
plasticity to variable environmental conditions. This work was possible
thanks to the scientific permit (N° 241 HCEFLCD/DLCDPN/DPRN/CFF) granted
by the Agence Nationale des Eaux et Forêts (Morocco). Traits of plants from natural
populations For each species,
10 individuals per population were randomly collected at the end of their
cycle (June–July 2014). Three vegetative traits (height, leaf number, and
area) and five reproductive traits (fruit count, seeds per fruit, seeds
per plant, seed size, and mass of 40 seeds) were measured for each
individual. Here, "fruit" includes Isoetaceae sporangia, and
"seeds" include spores.
Traits of plants grown in common
garden A common garden
experiment examined trait variation among populations of six species under
uniform light, temperature, hydrology, and substrate. Plants grew from
seeds (Spermatophytes) or sporangia (Lycopodiophytes) collected from 10
individuals per species per pond at the end of their cycle. Mean seed mass
(n = 40) was measured before the experiment. In
transparent plastic pots (8 cm diameter, 12 cm height), a layer of
synthetic cotton wool was placed at the bottom and then covered with 4 cm
of temporary pond sediment that was first sterilized (120 °C during 24
hours). To increase the chance of having at least one germination, three
seeds from the same population were planted in each pot which was flooded
with 2 cm of tap water. For each species, 10 replicates per population
were set up (270 pots total). Pots were randomly placed in a sunlit lab,
watered daily (2 cm depth), and fully randomized weekly. Temperature was
recorded weekly. Every three weeks, vegetative traits were measured on
three individuals per pot, then averaged. After nine months, fruits per
plant were counted. To assess other reproductive traits, four dried fruits
per plant were analyzed for seed count, size, and mass (40
seeds). Data
analysis Trait associations
in natural populations were analyzed using a correlation matrix. Spearman
correlations examined relationships between traits and pond latitude for
both field-collected and laboratory-grown plants across all six species. A
similar approach was used to assess the relationship between traits and
rainfall, separately for individuals collected in the field and for plants
cultivated in the laboratory. To visualize trait
variation in each of the six species across regions, principal component
analyses (PCA) were conducted separately for field and cultivated plants.
Spearman correlations assessed the relationship between population
coordinates on PCA axis 1 and latitude. Functional trait differences
between regions were tested using one-way ANOVA for each
species. To quantify the phenotypic plasticity of the
plants investigated in this study, we used the Relative distance
plasticity index (RDPI) which allows statistical comparisons of plasticity
between species for each trait (Valladares et al., 2006). The function
‘rdpi’ of the R package ‘Plasticity’ was adapted for phenotypic plasticity
computing on the basis of phenotypic distances among individuals of the
same species under different environments. RDPI ranges
from 0 (no plasticity) to 1 (maximal plasticity) and is calculated as
follow: RDPI = ∑(d
ij →i′j′/(x i′j′ + x ij ) )/n
where: xij: is matrix of a specific trait x (i
row and j column) i: is a given level of the
environmental treatment (latitude) j: is to the
individual number identification d ij→i′j′: absolute
value of distances between all pairs of individuals from the same species
under different environments x i′j′ + x ij: sum of
trait values of all pairs of individuals from the same species under
different environments n: is the total number of
distances Differences of RDPI values for each trait
between species were evaluated with one-way ANOVA and post hoc
Tukey mean comparison test using R software.
Species' investment preference (reproductive or vegetative)
was analyzed using Spearman correlation between latitude and the seed
mass/plant height ratio. These traits were chosen as the strongest
indicators of reproductive and vegetative investment (Table 2).
Multivariate and univariate analyses were performed using
STATISTICA 10 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa OK, USA). # Plastic response in amphibious plant functional traits along a
latitudinal (climate) gradient Dataset DOI:
[10.5061/dryad.x95x69px4](10.5061/dryad.x95x69px4) ## Description of the
data and file structure Twenty temporary ponds across six regions
(Tangier, Mamora, Benslimane, Chaouia, Jbilets, and Essaouira) were
selected along a 750 km north-south gradient (35°–31°N). This gradient
aligns with increasing aridity, as annual rainfall decreases from 856 mm
in the north to 264 mm in the south. We hypothesized that the differences
between populations in observed functional traits (vegetative and
reproductive) result from plastic response to the variable environment
rather than of a local genetic adaptation. ### Files and variables ####
File: Field_and_experiment_data_El_Madihi_et_al_oikos-2026.xlsx
**Description: 2 sheets** **Description of sheet 'Plant
traits'** ##### Variables * Type: (2 values “Field” and “Experiment”
for data from plants collected in the wild or grown in mesocosm in common
garden conditions respectively * Pond code: identifies each pond (20) *
Species: identifies plant species (6) * Replicate: 10 randomly selected
plants for each pond and species * Region: identifies the region (6) where
the ponds are located * Height (cm): individual plant height * Number of
leaves for each individual plant * Leaf area: mean surface area of
individual leave (calculated as the Length X width on 3 leaves per plant)
* Number of fruits per plant * Seed weight (40 seeds / spores) calculated
as the mean value of 4 fruits/plant * Number of seeds per fruit calculated
as the mean value of 4 fruits/plant * Seed size: Length X width (mean of 5
replicates) * Number of seeds per plant: sum of the number of seeds per
fruit The sheet “Pond information” contains 10 columns with the following
information: **Description of sheet 'Pond information'** * Pond
code (20): identifies each pond * Région (6): identifies the region where
the pond is located * Latitude: identifies the latitude of the pond. Exact
coordinates of the ponds are not provided as they contained endangered
species IUCN RedList): *Damasonium polyspermum*: VU, *Isoetes setacea* (=
*I. delilei*): NT; *Baldellia ranunculoides*: NT; *Elatine brochonii*: NT)
* Precipitation: mean annual rainfall (mm) * The following columns (E-J)
shows for each pond what species were used for trait analysis both in the
field and in experimental conditions. 'Null' n the cells means
that the corresponding species was not studied in that pond. ####
**Description of file 'plasticity_analysis.R'** * Multivariate
and univariate analyses were performed using STATISTICA 10 (StatSoft Inc.,
Tulsa OK, USA). * To quantify the phenotypic plasticity of the plants
investigated in this study, we used the Relative distance plasticity index
(RDPI) which allows statistical comparisons of plasticity between species
for each trait (Valladares et al., 2006). The function ‘rdpi’ of the R
package ‘Plasticity’ was adapted for phenotypic plasticity computing on
the basis of phenotypic distances among individuals of the same species
under different environments. Differences of RDPI values for each trait
between species were evaluated with one-way ANOVA and *post hoc* Tukey
mean comparison test using R software.