Pragmatic markers (PMs) contribute in conversations to a
great extent even though they have no significant relevance
to the meaning of the communication content itself.
Pragmatic markers such as you know, um, well, and actually
play a vital role in structuring conversations, managing
turn-taking, and maintaining social relationships. This
study examines the use of pragmatic markers (PMs) in the
spoken discourse of undergraduates at Kaduna State
University (KASU), Kafanchan Campus. The study aims at
exploring the complex roles that PMs play, especially in
specific contexts, such as university settings, where students
engage in diverse forms of discourse, ranging from casual
peer interactions to formal academic discussions. The
research adopts a mixed-method approach, combining both
quantitative and qualitative analyses to investigate the
frequency and functions of these markers in informal peer
interactions and formal academic discussions. Data were
collected through the recording of 20 hours of natural
conversations across different contexts, followed by
transcription and coding of the occurrences of specific PMs.
The quantitative analysis reveals the predominant use of you
know, um, and so in informal settings, while actually and I
mean appear more frequently in formal academic contexts.
The study observes gender-based differences with female
students using hesitation markers more frequently than
male students. The qualitative analysis highlights the social
functions of PMs, including their role in signaling
agreement, managing uncertainty, marking hesitation, and
fostering social solidarity. The study contributes to the
comprehension of PMs function in Nigerian university
discourse, offering insights into their role in both informal
communication and academic settings. The findings
suggest that PMs are essential tools for managing social
dynamics, maintaining conversational flow, and
constructing academic identities. The study recommends
further research on PM use in other Nigerian and African
universities and suggests integrating pragmatic competence
into language education programmes to improve students'
communication skillsin both formal and informal contexts.