Nigerian Arabic has two structures for coding N +
N relations: one in which the properties of
the possessed noun are severely constrained and one in which
the possessed and possessor nouns allow a full complement of
modifiers. Similar to the methodology of Poplack and her
collaborators (e.g., Sankoff, Poplack, & Vanniarajan, 1990),
a normative distribution of nouns in the two possessive structures
is established based on a corpus of monolingual (non-codeswitched)
Nigerian Arabic texts. In a corpus of codeswitched texts, the
distribution of English lexical insertions is found to deviate
markedly from these normative patterns. The notion of iconicity
is invoked to explain the skewed insertional patterns. It is
hypothesized on the basis of various psycholinguistic studies
that insertions from English are harder to access than are native
lexemes. To compensate for slower access time, speakers match
these insertions with the possessive structure that requires
a minimal amount of manipulation for rapid embedding. This,
it is shown, is the less iconic of the two possessive
constructions. What emerges is a distinctive pattern of possessives
characteristic of codeswitched Nigerian Arabic. After briefly
testing the iconicity hypothesis against insertional patterns
in Hausa and Standard Arabic, two other languages well attested
in the codeswitched corpus, the question is addressed as to
whether the codeswitched variety represents a code unto itself.