Cumulative malaria parasite exposure in endemic regions often results in
the acquisition of partial immunity and asymptomatic infections. There is
limited information on how host-parasite interactions mediate maintenance
of chronic symptomless infections that sustain malaria transmission. Here,
we have determined the gene expression profiles of the parasite population
and the corresponding host peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from
21 children (<15 years). We compared children who were defined as
uninfected, asymptomatic and those with febrile malaria. Children with
asymptomatic infections had a parasite transcriptional profile
characterized by a bias toward trophozoite stage (~12 hours-post invasion)
parasites and low parasite levels, while earlier ring stage parasites were
characteristic of febrile malaria. The host response of asymptomatic
children was characterized by downregulated transcription of genes
associated with inflammatory responses, compared to children with febrile
malaria. Interestingly, the host responses during febrile infections that
followed an asymptomatic infection featured stronger inflammatory
responses, whereas the febrile host responses from previously uninfected
children featured increased humoral immune responses. The priming effect
of prior asymptomatic infection may explain the blunted acquisition of
antibody responses seen to malaria antigens following natural exposure or
vaccination in malaria endemic areas. Proteins were extracted from PBMCs by resuspending the pellet
with 5µl of 6M UREA (Thermo scientific). The protein samples were then
adjusted with 50mM Triethylamonium bicarbonate (TEAB, Sigma-Aldrich) to
100µl and the protein concentration determined using the Bicinchoninic
acid (BCA) protein assay (Thermo scientific). The protein samples were
then reduced with 40mM dithiothretol, alkylated with 80mM iodoacetamide in
the dark, and quenched with 80mM iodoacetamide at room temperature,
followed by digestion with1µg/µl of trypsin (57). Nine pools, each
containing 9 samples and 1 control for batch correction, were prepared by
combining 1µl aliquots from each sample. The samples were pooled using a
custom randomization R script. The pooled samples were then individually
labelled using the Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) 10-plex kit (Thermo Scientific)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One isobaric tag was used
solely for the pooled samples and combined with peptides samples labelled
with the remaining 9 tags. The labelled peptide pools were then desalted
using a P10 C18 pipette ZipTips (Millipore) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Eluted peptides were dried in a Speedvac
concentrator (Thermo Scientific) and re-suspended in 15μl loading solvent
(98% H2O, 2% acetonitrile, 0.05% formic acid). The peptides were then
quantified using Qubit Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A
standardized protein concentration of 5µg was finally injected into the
LC-MS/MS for analysis. The peptides were then loaded onto the liquid
chromatography and separated on reverse-phase analytical column of 75µm x 50cm C18 (Thermo Scientific) and
measured using a Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer as described by
(Njunge
et al., 2019) and mass spectrometer output
files generated. To identify and quantify proteins,
mass spectrometer output files were analyzed using MaxQuant software
version 2.0.3.0 (Cox and Mann, 2008) by searching against the Uniprot
human proteome (downloaded on 10/06/2021) using the Andromeda search
engine (Cox
et al., 2011). N-terminal acetylation and
methionine oxidations were set as variable modifications while cysteine
carbamidomethylation and TMT-10plex labelled N-terminus and lysine were
set as a fixed modification. The false discovery rate (FDR) cut-off was
set as 0.01 for both proteins and peptides with a minimum length of seven
amino acids and was determined by searching a reverse database. Enzyme
specificity was set as C-terminal to arginine and lysine with trypsin as
the protease. Only up to two missed cleavages were allowed in the database
search. Peptide identification was performed with an allowed fragment mass
deviation maximum of 20 ppm (parts per million) and an initial precursor
mass deviation maximum of 7 ppm. Default parameters for Orbitrap-type data
were used. The pooled sample channels were used for batch correction. The
10-plex corrected reported ion intensity matrix was extracted from the
protein groups output file and used for downstream analysis. Proteins
matching the reversed part of a decoy database, potential contaminants and
proteins only identified by a modification site, were excluded.
Differential protein abundance analysis of the labelled samples
intensities generated by MaxQuant were performed using PERSEUS v2.05.0
MaxQuant software (MaxPlanck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried,
Germany) as described in (Tyanova and Cox, 2018). The files can be opened using MaxQuant software, specifically
version 2.0.3.0 was used for analysis. Differential
protein abundance analysis of MaxQuant output was done using PERSEUS
version 2.05.0 software. Protein-protein interaction
and Gene ontology analyses was perforened using STRING database version
11.5 (
string-db.org). # Proteome of peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from asymptomatic
malaria and uninfected individuals and the ensuing febrile malaria
episodes Proteins were extracted from peripheral mononuclear cells
(PBMCs), pooled using Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) (10-plex) and injected into
the LC-MS/MS for proteomics analysis. The output raw files were loaded
into MaxQuant software v2.0.3.0 for protein quantification. The output
from MaxQuant was then read using PERSEUS software v2.05.0 and
differential protein abundance analysis performed. The Proteomics_metadata
file contains the metadata that links each sample to the raw data files
and the treatment group (condition). ## Description of the data and file
structure The RAW data files provided contains the output data from the
LC-MS/MS per each pool. The pools serve as the input data for MaxQuant
software. The Proteomics_metadata contains the metadata information that
links each sample to the condition/treatment group (i.e. asymptomatic,
uninfected or febrile). * Code represents the short code given to each
samples during analysis. * Experiment is the TMT batch/pool that
correspond to the raw data file batches. * Condition refers to the
treatment group that each sample belongs to. Asymptomatic and Uninfected
refers to samples collected from individuals who had asymptomatic malaria
infections or from uninfected individuals, respectively. The
Febrile_Asymptomatic refers to samples collected when asymptomatic
individuals presented with malaria symptoms. Febrile_Uninfected refers to
samples collected when the uninfected individuals presented with malaria
symptoms.