Mechanistic trait models are increasingly considered to estimate persistence-related suitability for invasive species, although translating reproduction metrics into operational indicators for spatial decision-making remains challenging. Branching-process transformations are widely applied to convert mechanistic reproduction numbers into probabilities of establishment; however, such transformations may compress spatial gradients when persistence is broadly feasible. Using tomato red spider mite (
Tetranychus evansi
) as a case study across Africa, this study developed an uncertainty-aware, physiologically-based model and generated spatially explicit estimates of expected reproduction (R
0
). We compared three representations: raw mechanistic suitability, branching-process persistence probability, and quantile-normalised suitability. Although all representations preserved rank ordering, branching probability showed strong spatial saturation (>93% of pixels have
P
=
1
−
1
R
0
close to 1), reducing effective resolution for prioritisation. In contrast, quantile normalisation retained uniform spatial contrast and stable hotspot delineation under fixed-effort targeting. Our findings demonstrate that indicator choice fundamentally affects interpretability, and that rank-based transformations may provide more robust ecological indicators for spatial and spatiotemporal decision support under uncertainty.