Abstract
Research findings on the aspectual marking system in sign
languages points towards diverse thinking. At first it was claimed that aspect
marking is inflectional morphology. This, however, has been questioned on the
grounds that it does not meet the basic criteria for inflectional status, and is in
fact derivational or belonging to a highly iconic class of ideophonic morphology. It
also has been argued that the system is neither inflectional nor derivational, but
gestural. These different analytical perspectives are still a subject of discussion.
This paper is a part of wider research on forms, meanings of the aspect marking
system in Ethiopian Sign Language (EthSL) and examines the nature of the aspect
marking system observed in EthSL in light of the ongoing discussions. Seven deaf
language consultants of differing ages and genders were involved. McCarthy’s
prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology was used as a theoretical framework
for the analysis of the data. The analysed data refutes the gestural nature of the
aspect marking system and points to the direction of inflectional morphology.