Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Verb extensions and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu: The case of Sumbwa

Domaine:

natural language processing
Créateur:
Kah
Éditeur:
Language Science Press
Hôte:avatar
This study has two aims: (a) to describe verbal extensions in Sumbwa and theirvalence, and (b) to contribute to Bantu comparative data that may be used in researchon Bantu morphosyntactic parametric variation as proposed in Guérois et al. (2017).The description covers all extensions that could be identified in the data at hand(e.g. Capus 1898, Kahigi 2008a,b), focusing on the forms and their various meanings, their valence possibilities, their productivity and co-occurrence constraints.The study reveals that most of the Proto-Bantu verb extensions reconstructed byMeeussen (1967) and Guthrie (1971) are still active in the language. Some extensionsare found to be highly productive (applicative, passive, causative (also instrumental), associative, stative, and frequentative), others moderately or semi-productive(persistive, reversive, impositive and denominative) and quite a number may beregarded as being unproductive (associative/reciprocal -an-, reiterative, static, contactive and other minor extensions). The second aim of the study is to considerhow Sumbwa compares to other Bantu languages by drawing on the parameterson verbal derivation identified in Guérois et al. (2017). Some of the findings agreewith what is found in the majority of Eastern Bantu languages, e.g. the verb deriva-tional strategies follow closely those mapped out by the PB reconstructions, exceptfor a few innovations among the minor extensions (e.g. -agan-, -agil-). However,Sumbwa does not have ba-passives found in Bemba, nor does it have the CARPorder as postulated by Hyman (2002) for Bantu. Some of the notable characteristicsof Sumbwa verb extensions include the fact that (a) the causative and instrumentalshare extensions, (b) the associative markers include the post-verbal -an- and thepre-verbal -i-, which is homophonous with the reflexive; (c) the applicative conveys benefactive, directive, location, and reason meanings; (d) there is no systematicfixed order of extensions, except that in all co-occurrences, the passive comes last.

Visit

doi.orgzenodo.org

Languages

BembaSumbwa

Tags

Sumbwa verb extensionsValenceParameters of morphosyntactic variation

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similaires

Morphosyntactic variation in East African Bantu languagesMorphosyntactic variation in Bantu: Focus on East AfricaLocative inversion in Otjiherero: more on morphosyntactic variation in BantuBenefactive and Malefactive Verb Extensions in the Koalib Verb SystemVerb extensions in Swahili languageCommon Bantoid verb extensions

Morphosyntactic variation in East African Bantu languages

International audience The approximately 500 Bantu languages spoken across vast areas

Morphosyntactic variation in Bantu: Focus on East Africa

International audience Recent studies have developed a systematic approach to morphos

Locative inversion in Otjiherero: more on morphosyntactic variation in Bantu

This paper discusses locative inversion constructions in Otjiherero against the background of previo

Benefactive and Malefactive Verb Extensions in the Koalib Verb System

International audience In Koalib (Niger-Congo, Kordofanian branch, Heiban family), a

Verb extensions in Swahili language

Common Bantoid verb extensions

In this paper I survey verb extensions within different Bantoid languages and sub- groups, comparing them to Cameroonian Bantu zone A. Extending my survey of Niger-Congo extensions (Hyman 2007), I show that there is a band of contiguous languages in the Grassfields