The rapid proliferation of generative AI has fundamentally altered how cultural narratives are
produced, circulated, and contested, raising urgent questions about representational authority,
cultural ownership, and algorithmic accountability. Nowhere are these tensions more
consequential than in the portrayal of forcibly displaced populations, where AI-generated
content increasingly shapes public discourse and policy imaginaries. This study examines the
ethical implications of AI-mediated cultural representation of Sub-Saharan refugees in Tunisia,
a critical yet underexplored nexus of AI ethics, migration studies, and cultural mediation
scholarship. Employing a qualitative normative-empirical design that integrates systematic
discourse analysis of AI-generated migration content with semi-structured interviews
involving refugees, civil society activists, and media professionals, the study pursues three
objectives: (1) to identify representational patterns and ethical tensions embedded in AIgenerated migration discourse, (2) to explore how diverse stakeholders perceive and negotiate
cultural ownership and narrative authority in algorithmic environments, and (3) to propose a
culturally grounded ethical framework for responsible AI mediation. The findings reveal three
intersecting dilemmas, narrative appropriation that displaces refugee agency, persistent
stereotyping that reinforces reductive tropes, and algorithmic opacity that obscures the logics
governing representational choices. Together, these dilemmas expose a critical accountability
gap: AI systems produce culturally consequential narratives without meaningful input from the
communities they represent. The study contributes to the growing interdisciplinary literature
on responsible AI by advancing a participatory governance model that foregrounds refugee
perspectives within digital knowledge systems and offers actionable guidelines for culturally
responsible algorithmic representation in sensitive sociopolitical contexts.