Global Socioeconomic Context and Brain Ageing in Epilepsy: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study

Introduction Brain structural differences consistent with an older-appearing brain have been reported in people with epilepsy, but the extent to which these differences reflect clinical characteristics vs broader socioeconomic context is unclear. We investigated whether country-level socioeconomic factors are associated with neuroanatomical differences in adults with epilepsy using MRI-based age prediction, along with epilepsy subtype, sex, and clinical factors. Methods Structural MRI and clinical data were collected from 26 epilepsy centres across 12 countries in the Americas, Australia, Europe, Asia and Africa. MRI-based age estimates were estimated using a previously developed prediction model trained on 29,175 healthy subjects. Brain predicted age difference (BrainPAD) was calculated as the difference between MRI-predicted brain age and chronological age. National gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and income inequality (Gini index) were obtained from the World Bank. Associations between BrainPAD and epilepsy subtype (temporal lobe epilepsy, extratemporal epilepsy, and genetic generalised epilepsy), national socioeconomic context (GDP per capita and Gini index), age and sex were assessed using regression models. Results We analyzed 2,109 individuals with epilepsy and 1,041 healthy non-epilepsy controls (57% female; median age = 35; range 17-83). BrainPAD was higher in epilepsy than controls (β 4.2 years, SE 0.4; t=10.6), with increases ranging from 2.5 to 6 years across subtypes. Male sex was associated with 1 year higher BrainPAD relative to females (SE 0.33, t=3.12). There were no main effects of GDP or Gini index; however, significant interactions between were observed. The effect of epilepsy on BrainPAD was greater in countries with lower GDP per capita (t=-2.74) and higher income inequality (t=2.72). Conclusions Clinical factors and socioeconomic context both influence brain structural ageing in epilepsy. These findings highlight the importance of geographic and economic diversity in neuroimaging research and underscore the relevance of global socioeconomic context when interpreting brain health measures.