Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Library and information science research in BRICS countries

Creator:
ManV.KParLoh
Publisher:
Eme
Host:
Purpose This paper aims to highlight the research output of library and information science of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) nations during the ten year period, i.e. 2005-2014, as reflected through the Web of Science database. Design/methodology/approach This study used Social Science Index (SSCI) of Web of Science (WoS) citation database to collect data for the ten year period. All records indexed in SSCI were refined by subject area of “Information Science and Library Science” and selected countries. The downloaded results were analyzed by using specific parameters. Findings WoS indexes different kinds of documents, such as articles, conference proceedings, biographical items, book reviews, corrections, editorial material, letters, reprints and reviews. Out of the BRICS output, almost 90 per cent of papers were articles. Other types of documents included conference papers, review papers and book reviews. China contributed nearly half of the documents followed by Brazil, South Africa, India and Russia. On an average, a document had cited 34 references. More than one-third of records did not receive any citations. It has been observed that the titles that had 11-16 words attracted the most number of citations. The top ten publishers in whose journals the researchers published included Emerald, Elsevier and Springer. The primary subject areas were information science and library science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications and management. About 85 per cent of the documents were published in English. Around 93 per cent of the non-English research publications were in Portuguese, the official language of Brazil. Originality/value There are not many studies on BRICS countries and that too about Library and Information Science (LIS) research output. This study may reveal insights into how LIS researchers interact with local and global issues in a specific spectrum of the world community.

Visit

doi.org

Licenses

https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

Similar

Professionalism in library and information scienceMapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisationResearch Trends in Library and Information Science in South Africa and Nigeria: A Content AnalysisImproving Library and Information Science Education in NigeriaInfluence of Electronic Library Services on Research Activities of Library and Information Science Students in Nasarawa State University, KeffiGrowth of predatory open access journals: implication for quality assurance in library and information science research

Professionalism in library and information science

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the current trends, needs and opportunities o

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the research output on “library

Research Trends in Library and Information Science in South Africa and Nigeria: A Content Analysis

Abstract A review of the research trends in library and information science (LIS) i

Improving Library and Information Science Education in Nigeria

Emerging technologies are causing substantial changes in the education of Library and Information Sc

Influence of Electronic Library Services on Research Activities of Library and Information Science Students in Nasarawa State University, Keffi

This paper examined the influence of electronic library services on research activities of Library a

Growth of predatory open access journals: implication for quality assurance in library and information science research

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine perceived and factual realities of open access pre