Abstract
Background:
Admission policy in Uganda’s health training institutions is a decisive factor in shaping the quality and safety of the healthcare workforce. Current systems emphasize cut off points and prerequisite subjects Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics, and English, yet competence based education reforms demand more nuanced approaches.
Objective:
This study investigated whether pre entry subject performance predicted academic, practical, and progression outcomes among certificate level nursing, midwifery, and pharmacy trainees in Fort Portal, Uganda. The aim was to evaluate the empirical defensibility of strict subject criteria and to explore whether admission reform should emphasize bridging, monitoring, and early support mechanisms.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study examined admission records and training outcomes from two health training institutions to evaluate the predictive validity of O-Level subject grades. Data were collected using pretested tools from admission records, and academic performance reports, Outcomes assessed were cumulative grade point average (CGPA), practical competence (OSCE/OSPE), and progression indicators such as paper failures and timely completion. Data were entered into SPSS and R for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline characteristics. Linear regression models were used to determine the association between admission predictors (subject grades, sex, age, program, institution) and training outcomes. Results were reported as beta coefficients with 95% confidence intervals and p-values, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results:
The majority of learners (286/401, 71.3%) were female, with a mean admission age of 19.9 years. No entry subject independently predicted overall CGPA, paper failure, or timely completion. Lower numerical entrance scores suggested better prior performance in the adjusted model (β = − 0.645, 95% CI − 1.243 to − 0.047, p = 0.035). Mathematics was moderately but significantly correlated with OSCE/OSPE performance (r = − 0.137, p = 0.007). Program and institutional factors were stronger predictors: certificate nursing students had higher odds of finishing on time (AOR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.37–4.56), while certificate pharmacy students had higher odds of failing compared to midwifery students (AOR = 4.05, 95% CI 1.80–9.10).
Conclusion:
Uganda’s reliance on rigid subject prerequisites may not fully capture the competencies required for certificate level health training. Admission reform should integrate bridging programs, structured mentorship, and early support systems to ensure both patient safety and equitable access to training. These findings contribute to ongoing debates on competence based education and socially responsive admissions in low resource settings.