Applied psychologists working in African community settings routinely invoke social support, cohesion and resilience to explain why some neighbourhoods, congregations and mutual-aid groups sustain wellbeing under adversity while others do not, yet imported instruments often misdescribe the communal practices they purport to measure. Drawing on community psychology, stress and coping theory and cross-cultural self-construal research, it proposes three testable pathways with explicit boundary conditions and a sequential qualitative-quantitative design for adapting constructs, validating measures and integrating interpretive and statistical inference across diverse sites. The contribution is bounded and prospective: a conceptually disciplined and ethically grounded template for future collaborative fieldwork rather than a report of completed empirical findings.