Barriers to Timely Surgery for Breast Cancer in Rwanda

Abstract 81 Purpose Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for nonmetastatic breast cancer. Little is known about the quality of breast surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa. Research at the Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence (BCCOE), Rwanda’s first public cancer center, has suggested that access to timely surgery is inadequate, but barriers have not been systematically examined. The aim of the current study was to gain an understanding of the barriers to breast cancer surgery among patients who were diagnosed at BCCOE by investigating delays and interruptions in care. Methods We used a standardized chart abstraction instrument to collect demographic, treatment, and outcome data as of November 2017 for all patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer at BCCOE in 2014 and 2015. We recorded all visits and treatments received until surgery, disease progression, or loss to follow-up for all patients with stage I to III breast cancer. Results During 2014 and 2015, 91 patients were diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer and were treated with curative intent—67 patients (74%) underwent surgery, with 22 undergoing surgery at BCCOE and 45 elsewhere. Of the 24 patients with no surgery, 16 were lost to follow-up and eight experienced disease progression before surgical evaluation. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 103 days (range, 30 to 826 days) for patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and 268 days (range, 108 to 794 days) for patients with NAC. We defined surgical delays as > 120 days from diagnosis without NAC or > 365 days from diagnosis if NAC was administered. Of the 67 patients who had surgery, 26 patients (39%) experienced delays. When documented, reasons for delay included patient factors, such as social and/or financial issues (n = 5), seeking alternate treatment (n = 2), refusing referral to Kigali (n = 3), or any surgery (n = 1); system factors, such as surgeon nonavailability (n = 1); and changes in clinical status, such as pregnancy (n = 5), treatment-associated adverse events (n = 4), or the need for a second surgical opinion (n = 2). Unexplained failure to complete the initial surgical referral (n = 5) and missed NAC treatment appointments (n = 6) were frequent contributors. Some patients had multiple reasons for delay. For five patients, there was no documented explanation. Conclusion We observed high rates of loss to follow-up, surgical delays, and lapses in care at the point of surgical referral. Identification of the barriers to completing referrals could guide strategies for improving access to timely surgery. Efforts are needed to address social and financial barriers and explore patients’ refusals to undergo surgery. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No COIs from the authors.