Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Impact of Language Pairing Order on XLM-R-Large Robustness in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Domaine:

natural language processing

Type de record:

paper
Créateur:
Ass
Éditeur:
Zenodo
Hôte:avatar
Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, especially in low-resource settings. This paper investigates how cross-lingual transfer via sequential fine-tuning affects euphemism detection across five languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, and Yoruba. We compare sequential fine-tuning with monolingual and simultaneous fine-tuning using XLM-R and mBERT, analyzing how performance is shaped by language pairings, typological features, and pretraining coverage. Results show that sequential fine-tuning with a high-resource L1 improves L2 perfo Research goal: How does the order of language pairings in sequential fine-tuning impact the robustness of XLM-R-Large against adversarial perturbations in cross-lingual euphemism detection, as measured by accuracy drops on MLAED for low-resource languages like Yoruba compared to high-resource languages like English? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.7/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 8.7/10.

Visit

doi.org

Languages

Yoruba

Tags

orderlanguagepairingssequentialfine-tuningimpactrobustnessXLM-R-Large

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similaires

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuningCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance of XLM-R-Large vs. Larger Models on XTREME-R BenchmarkIntermediate Language Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection in XLM-RInference Throughput of XLM-R-Large in Mixed-Language vs. Monolingual Batches for Cross-Lingual Euphemism DetectionCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuningImpact of Intermediate Languages on Cross-Lingual Robustness in Yoruba Euphemism Detection

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance of XLM-R-Large vs. Larger Models on XTREME-R Benchmark

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Intermediate Language Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection in XLM-R

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Inference Throughput of XLM-R-Large in Mixed-Language vs. Monolingual Batches for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Impact of Intermediate Languages on Cross-Lingual Robustness in Yoruba Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec